Thursday, December 2, 2010

origins debate

http://ejournal.belhaven.edu/religion_philosophy/deconstructing_origins_debate.htm

  1. What did Stephan Gould argue about concerning religion and evolution?
  2. What is the supposed probability that evolution could occur?(keyword: random shuffling)
  3. For what reason is it that evolutionists believe that intelligent design should not be considered science?(after into)
Posted by at

2 comments:

  1. braileelDecember 6, 2010 at 9:01 AM

    1. Gould is saying that science and religion cannot be thought of together. Believing what Darwin says abuot evolution and also being a christian and believing what the Bible says about how earth was created isn't possible being how they are completely different.
    2. The probability of discovering it by random shuffling is 10 to the 40,000th power
    3. Creationists can't give scientific evidence for their beliefs so it should be considered a religious belief.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brittany MeiseDecember 7, 2010 at 6:43 PM

    1. He is saying that according to religion and the bible God created this world and that the genes evolution is due to him also. According to science though Darwins theory proves opposite to religion. This makes it so that they can't be related.
    2. By random shuffling is 10(40,000th)
    3. their Beliefs should be considered reilgious because they have no evidence to prove what they think

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)